Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$100
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 145
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 683
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$201
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.5% Good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 85.9
Parallax 81
71% 84.6 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 68.4
67% 84.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,760
Write 1,852
Mixed 1,416
374% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 57.2
234% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 1,089
DQ Mixed 109
299% 622 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
43GB free
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 79 138 56 75 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 437
Write 357
Mixed 324
SusWrite 68.7
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 16.9
67% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.4
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 16.1
63% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
279GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 82
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 56.3
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 115 120 121 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 14.2
Write 32.3
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 116
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-DW50 DDR4 3200 AX4U32008G16A-DW50 DDR4 3200 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 34.4
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 24.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback