MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 10:35
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 171
2-Core 339
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 920
96% 771 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(1B4C 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 70
Parallax 66.3
53% 67.3 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 66.1
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 1TB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 446 419 457 448 468 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1071
Write 1,544
Mixed 1,197
SusWrite 548
246% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 40.4
127% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 308
226% 298 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 129%
Great: 242%
Fanxiang S790 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2002 1834 1959 1964 1949 1966 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2101
Write 1,982
Mixed 1,864
SusWrite 1,946
445% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 51.7
162% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 304
224% 297 MB/s
Poor: 267%
This bench: 267%
Great: 589%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGU880-32A160U 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.7
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback