Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 105
48% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 321
30% 250 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM1T9HMJP-00005 2TB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM5304Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 408 405 398 392 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 403
Write 365
Mixed 350
SusWrite 391
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 18.8
90% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 350
257% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
136GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 84.5
Write 43
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 56.4
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 59%
WDC WD50 00HHTZ-75N21V0 500GB
225GB free, PID b567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 53
Write 25.2
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 25.2
39% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.4
89% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback