Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43% Average	Memory 29 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 139 42% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 368 45% 344 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 57 120 113 112 106 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 111 SusWrite 105 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 6.6 20% 6.63 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 113 87% 118 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 83%
Jmicron Tech 256GB 457 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 0GB free Firmware: 0407 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 184 Write 167 Mixed 132 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 7.4 25% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 112 88% 121 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-110.A00G 9905678-105.A00G 9905678-138.A00G 9905678-138.A00G 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 18.4 60% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 6.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	254x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	163x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	149x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $972

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16