| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20200629 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '23 at 06:51 |
| Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
| Run User | BGD-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.8%
Good
|
64% 107 Pts
|
32% 252 Pts
|
17% 281 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
|
1.34%
Terrible
|
1% 1.47 fps
|
2% 1.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDS120G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 14 36 23 29 39 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
31% 141 MB/s
|
69% 20.6 MB/s
|
36% 74.2 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
75GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s
|
2% 2.57 MB/s
|
512% 4.1 MB/s
| ||
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
207GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 86 86 85 85 MB/s
|
46.7%
Average
|
54% 73.9 MB/s
|
138% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 8GB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,585 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 715x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 280x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 264x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 617x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |