Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 111 52% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 424 38% 319 Pts	64-Core 1,329 82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB 14,174 User benchmarks, average bench 406% 911GB free (System drive) Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1162 1166 1179 1172 1256 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,461 Write 1,656 Mixed 1502 SusWrite 1,176 327% 1,448 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 39.5 122% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 486 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 429 306% 397 MB/s
Poor: 239% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 591%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB0-CRC M393A1K43BB0-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	MC Read 47.5 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 36.8 116% 40.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 14 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	743x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	145x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	130x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	178x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16