ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 90HC002YUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 90HC002YUK (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36E2
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190408
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '23 at 07:41
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 162 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 287 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 36E2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 5.9 0% 4.03 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 9.1 5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.85% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 43 63 101 156 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 541GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 71 71 73 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 72 Write 49.8 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 71.3 70% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 43%
ST6000NM 0024-1HT17Z 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 187 186 187 183 187 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79% Very good	Read 186 Write 174 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 186 208% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.1 166% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FN Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 19.6 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 90HC002YUK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90HC002YUK

CPU
Core i5-7400TIntelBench 65%, 4,070 samples	4x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	4x

SSD
WDS100T2B0C 1TBWDCBench 218%, 8,724 samples	1x
Optane+931GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 654 samples	1x
Generic 128GBJmicronBench 54%, 413 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	3x
KMKYF9-MIB KMKYF9-MID 16GBKingstonBench 70%, 11 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback