Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory	46.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230303
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '23 at 11:29
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 69 1-Core 154 2-Core 298 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 914 86% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,253 78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 16F2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.9% Very good	Lighting 94 Reflection 138 Parallax 85.5 77% 106 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 90.2 Splatting 81.6 80% 101 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 10,852 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 656 780 733 727 720 715 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,946 Write 1,484 Mixed 1,264 SusWrite 722 302% 1,354 MB/s	4K Read 62.1 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 78.4 265% 91.2 MB/s	DQ Read 955 DQ Write 394 DQ Mixed 895 604% 748 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 313%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB 5,258 User benchmarks, average bench 396% 567GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 1494 1506 1499 1487 1502 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 1,854 Write 1,431 Mixed 1,569 SusWrite 1,495 357% 1,587 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 98.8 4K Mixed 65.8 214% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 372 DQ Mixed 878 598% 749 MB/s
Poor: 252% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 489%
SSD 4TB 4TB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 199 153 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 280 Write 332 Mixed 281 SusWrite 120 57% 253 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 23.7 77% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 92.1 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 131 96% 123 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 2x31.5GB 927 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 32.9 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 18.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	1,252x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	828x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	702x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	844x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	670x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	595x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	1,007x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	617x
8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E2 1x16GBMicronBench 47%, 2,656 samples	156x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16