Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 121
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 193
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 4.56
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
5TB free
Firmware: CC96 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 168
Mixed 130
119% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 115
Mixed 108
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.36
94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 CM3X2G1333C9 Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 6GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.6
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback