$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
System$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)  (all builds)
Motherboard$(DEFAULT_STRING) $(DEFAULT_STRING)
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 36
2-Core 79.4
29% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 67.4
11% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.9
2% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M4SSD256G 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 157 129 143 126 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 337
Write 324
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 145
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 7.4
54% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 50.9
DQ Write 80.6
DQ Mixed 144
87% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 69%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$72
178GB free
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 203 189 183 193 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 405
Write 368
Mixed 346
SusWrite 205
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 35.7
113% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 118
118% 190 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 118%
Seagate Portable 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 100 97 89 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 102
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 93.8
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical $(DEFAULT_STRING) Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: $(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback