Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 13:38
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 41.4
1-Core 56
2-Core 100
38% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 140
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.4
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M4SSD256G 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 325 266 164 171 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 346
Write 253
Mixed 341
SusWrite 238
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 27.6
105% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 177
140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3755 HP E27m G4
Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback