Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 14:12
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 973
92% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,350
84% 1,350 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 133
Parallax 291
114% 188 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 145
Splatting 198
162% 199 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 52
51% 58.5 fps
MRender 43.4
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 48.6
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$198
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2767 2532 2780 2115 2788 2955 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,657
Write 3,218
Mixed 2,932
SusWrite 2656
648% 2,866 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 104
337% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1378
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,264
949% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 430%
Great: 508%
Adata S510 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 5.0.5c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 127 127 127 130 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 430
Write 154
Mixed 213
SusWrite 131
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 35.9
136% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 122
101% 145 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
393GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2306 806 808 813 814 812 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,382
Mixed 1,892
SusWrite 1,060
441% 1,967 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 89.7
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1,348
1,016% 1,361 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 321%
Great: 346%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
376GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 91.8
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 93.2
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 132 129 131 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 26
SusWrite 130
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 176 174 176 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 162
Mixed 104
SusWrite 173
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 140 139 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 139
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 109%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 120 121 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 128
Write 116
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 120
148% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
264% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 66%
WD easystore 2648 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 92.4
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 108
131% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO Builds (Compare 1,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,774
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback