Intel NUC7i3BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel NUC7i3BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i3BNB  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '17 at 04:16
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 136
60% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 211
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 9.19
Parallax 6.38
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 13.6
8% 8.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
Read 376
Write 288
Mixed 295
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 19.8
110% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 44.8
86% 174 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i3BNB Builds (Compare 174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i3BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback