Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 01:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 199
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 373
43% 337 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 59.8
45% 60.7 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 54.2
48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 338 402 449 461 459 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 240GB
152GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 222 255 276 286 285 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 242
Write 254
Mixed 231
SusWrite 266
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 13.8
60% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 23.1
42% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 67%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
436GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 187 219 239 246 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.5% Very good
Read 257
Write 239
Mixed 217
SusWrite 228
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 41
126% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 191
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 1313 SRT4G88U1-P9Z 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 13% 62 218 60 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC0C8 PHL 274E5
Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback