Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD5 TH
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 645
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7.8
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 1036 1012 983 1005 972 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,791
Write 1,260
Mixed 735
SusWrite 995
266% 1,195 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 45
157% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 447
367% 537 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 207%
Great: 283%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
790GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 115 112 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 114
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72
49GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 68.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 74.8
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 52%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
133GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 116 116 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
WD WD2000FYYZ-DATTO-1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01KD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 147 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 135
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 148
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 19.5
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 20 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM03F5 SyncMaster
Typical GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $943
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback