Lenovo 4354C3G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4354C3G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 19:11
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 127
55% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 473
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 350
HP(103C 2B51) 2GB
Driver: 21.09.08.06
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 15.2
9% 14.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 243
Write 218
Mixed 227
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 22
91% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 50.7
78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 105%
Intenso Rainbow Line 16GB
10GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 985
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.7
217% 329 MB/s
4K Read 89.1
4K Mixed 0
496% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.5% Good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78A5 BenQ GL2450
Typical 4354C3G Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4354C3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback