Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJFE53F11X-B0211H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo VJFE53F11X-B0211H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-IL
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 35.6
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 164
50% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 220
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.7
5% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 9
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D256 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 94 170 164 138 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 845
Write 185
Mixed 556
SusWrite 153
96% 435 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 10.2
44% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 69.5
93% 171 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 170%
VendorC ProductCode 64GB
59GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 12 12 14 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 11.5
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 0.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical VJFE53F11X-B0211H Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE53F11X-B0211H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback