Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C02
Motherboard	MSI B450 Tomahawk (all builds)
Memory	20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220725
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '23 at 00:34
Run Duration	436 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 168 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 588 54% 453 Pts	64-Core 795 49% 795 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245 14,868 User benchmarks, average bench 86% XFX(1EAE 6505) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.1% Very good	Lighting 82.3 Reflection 82.8 Parallax 159 67% 108 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 151 90% 104 fps
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 93%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic DISK02 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 46 47 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	Read 220 Write 209 Mixed 139 SusWrite 47.4 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.5 27% 7.7 MB/s	DQ Read 5.5 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 0.9 3% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 19%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 47 46 47 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	Read 218 Write 212 Mixed 142 SusWrite 47.1 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 0.8 29% 8.5 MB/s	DQ Read 4.1 DQ Write 11.2 DQ Mixed 0.5 2% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 11TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 46 47 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.9% Very poor	Read 225 Write 207 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 47.4 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 1.2 25% 7.4 MB/s	DQ Read 5.5 DQ Write 8.8 DQ Mixed 0.4 2% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 12TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 10TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 46 47 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.4% Very poor	Read 209 Write 199 Mixed 103 SusWrite 47.4 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 0.9 25% 7.27 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 1 4% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 29%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB 6,787 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: PT0D SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 87 74 88 95 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 121 Write 121 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 85.6 64% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 345GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 187 164 181 191 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 107 Write 135 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 180 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.4% Terrible	Read 11.4 Write 18.9 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 17.9 12% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 87%
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 12.5TB free, PID 4d10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 13 11 9.2 8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 0.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 2 SusWrite 12 7% 4.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 20%
JMicron Generic DISK03 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 106 Write 135 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 0.6 102% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 62%
H/W DISK 1 4TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 124 Write 119 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 0.5 96% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 61%
H/W DISK 2 4TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.9 1.1 1.6 1 0.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 1.1 99% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 59%
H/W DISK 3 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 56 57 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 119 Write 124 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 56.1 118% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 915GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 55 56 56 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 99.6 Write 60.5 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 55.6 84% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK04 3TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.1 2.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 125 Write 140 Mixed 77 SusWrite 1.3 109% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 63%
JMicron Generic DISK02 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 523GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 74.8 Write 95.3 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 0.4 69% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK01 3TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 57 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 136 Write 148 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 57.7 135% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 57%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 57 57 57 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 86.5 Write 105 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 57.1 102% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 620GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.6 2.7 3 3.2 3.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.81% Terrible	Read 35.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 2.9 34% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.81% Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 22 23 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 33 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 21.5 39% 29 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 93% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 46%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 189GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 57 57 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.4% Below average	Read 101 Write 115 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 56.4 111% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 6.4 1.2 1.4 1 0.9 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 71.2 Write 40.4 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 11.1 50% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 53%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 81GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 51 56 56 56 57 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.8% Poor	Read 66.4 Write 75.3 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 46.1 79% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-2666 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K CL16-18-18 D4-2666 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.1% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 24.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 20.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	31.5"	1280 720	VIZ1027 D32f-G1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,811x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,125x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $150Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	903x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	574x
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	495x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	356x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	448x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	309x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $50Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	243x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	682x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	433x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	253x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $510

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $278	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370