Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$146
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 944
90% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 137
Parallax 122
99% 127 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 125
Splatting 114
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 2TB
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3527 2531 2197 1291 1341 1331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2643
Write 3,843
Mixed 2,899
SusWrite 2,036
646% 2,855 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 90.5
295% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 727
DQ Mixed 889
657% 870 MB/s
Poor: 279%
This bench: 360%
Great: 611%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 136
Mixed 71.7
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.2
Write 6
Mixed 14.2
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 31
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7004 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback