Asus PRIME Z490-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-A  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,065
98% 821 Pts
64-Core 1649
102% 1649 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 260
Parallax 278
222% 270 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 236
Splatting 184
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 193%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 150 140 142 137 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 250
Write 209
Mixed 289
SusWrite 145
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 37
138% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 191
162% 238 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
404GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2029 1629 1259 1263 1259 1259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,419
Write 2,215
Mixed 1610
SusWrite 1,450
431% 1,924 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 79.5
263% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 1,177
884% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 320%
Great: 372%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 303 301 1182 1386 1389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,233
Write 1,385
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 811
266% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 72.5
249% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1166
878% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 229%
Great: 426%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
875GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 133 133 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 128
Mixed 69
SusWrite 132
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 4.7
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 56%
WDC WD50 00AACS-61M6B2 500GB
120GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.4% Very poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 40.4
50% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
417GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.9% Poor
Read 100
Write 20
Mixed 36
SusWrite 37.1
54% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 1% 80 217 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27E3 ASUS VG278HE
Typical PRIME Z490-A Builds (Compare 7,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-A - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,053
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback