Today's hottest deals

Peladn HA-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemPeladn HA-1  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 20:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 248
73% 142 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 594
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 22.7
13% 17.1 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 18.6
13% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Peladn �� 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1862 1897 1610 256 246 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
242% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 2,071
Mixed 1,609
SusWrite 1,018
370% 1,643 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66.2
218% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 770
590% 805 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 242%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM71CC LS49A950U
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback