Today's hottest deals

Peladn HA-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemPeladn HA-1  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-1
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230519
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 21:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 749
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 24.4
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 22
Splatting 19.1
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Peladn �� 512GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1820 1803 277 270 278 265 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
226% Outstanding
Read 1,894
Write 2,194
Mixed 1,806
SusWrite 786
376% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 65.5
214% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 648
DQ Mixed 644
520% 742 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 226%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7187 LS32A80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback