Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-A (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191014
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '23 at 22:07
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 114 2-Core 220 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 645 63% 515 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.5% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 110 Parallax 98.8 79% 102 fps	MRender 92.8 Gravity 100 Splatting 100 80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 199 184 184 173 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 496 Write 357 Mixed 264 SusWrite 188 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 39.2 142% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 138 152% 258 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 357GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 159 160 160 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 115 Write 114 Mixed 68.1 SusWrite 159 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 28.4 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 24.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	54	165	27"	1280 720	AUS27C3 ASUS VG27V

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	68x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	60x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	40x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	13x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	10x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16