Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141013
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 21 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9650-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 67.6
38% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 118
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
655GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 158
Mixed 153
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 109%
Hdt72252 5DLA380 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: V44O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 61.1
Mixed 60.4
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.35
105% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kllisre DDR2 2G 0 Kllisre DDR2 2G 0 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback