Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 22:28
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$380
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,091
99% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,420
88% 1,420 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
HP(103C 8701) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 151
Parallax 153
126% 153 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 132
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1006 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1163 987 990 994 998 1007 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1569
Write 1,595
Mixed 1451
SusWrite 1023
317% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.5
201% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 797
DQ Mixed 902
674% 900 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 228%
Great: 268%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
928GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 363 363 369 370 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 413
Mixed 401
SusWrite 364
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 313
236% 315 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 133%
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 1TB
475GB free
Firmware: 1085
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 574
Write 570
Mixed 566
128% 570 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 27.3
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 31.4
50% 96 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 87%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 125 125 126 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 126
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 83%
Asmt ASM235CM 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 181 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 186
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 179
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Asmt ASM235CM 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 180 182 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 175
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 179
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 107%
Asmt ASM235CM 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 198
Write 162
Mixed 80.6
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 107%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92
Write 129
Mixed 84.1
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.1
165% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback