Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 23:14
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 95.8
45% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 285
28% 229 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia L4
Nvidia(10DE 16EE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2040 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 219
Parallax 196
144% 197 fps
MRender 279
Gravity 163
Splatting 168
162% 203 fps
Poor: 137%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
nvme_card-pd 166GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 16 11 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.97% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 16.5
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 14.3
12% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 14 64 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback