Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 20:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 154
57% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 483
47% 385 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia L4
Nvidia(10DE 16EE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2040 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 219
Parallax 190
140% 194 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 159
Splatting 164
159% 201 fps
Poor: 137%
This bench: 138%
Great: 140%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
nvme_card-pd 166GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 104 111 112 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
Read 121
Write 129
Mixed 129
SusWrite 110
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.7
294% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x16GB
3 of 3 slots used
48GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29.6
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 7 64 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback