PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H510M-HVS (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210304 |
Uptime | 15.8 Days |
Run Date | Oct 08 '23 at 10:20 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
84% 150 Pts
|
64% 521 Pts
|
39% 635 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
30% 39.1 fps
|
28% 34.7 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
82.7%
Excellent
|
84% 29.6 GB/s
|
69% 24.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 11 | 215 | 60 | 75 | 23.8" | 1920 1080 | AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 170x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 155x |
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples | 79x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $281 |