Today's hottest deals

LG 15Z90RT-G.AA75B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 15Z90RT-G.AA75B  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 15Z90RT
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 17:42
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 51.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 246
72% 139 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 774
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1854 0507) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 15.2
16% 18.5 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 11.7
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 591 544 745 724 779 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 674
221% 978 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 12.5
74% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 359
286% 412 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 55.2
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 141%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC418E
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback