HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive15.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 14:20
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 55.2
24% 40 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 167
17% 138 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 132 129 109 133 152 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.2% Very poor
Read 91
Write 90.3
Mixed 115
SusWrite 133
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.5
11% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6BX070N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 3.2
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 577
7% 577 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 32%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 17 14 64 0" 1536 793
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback