MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 10:13
Run Duration375 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 230
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 751
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 197
Parallax 200
100% 173 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 139
Splatting 93.8
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,838
Write 1,443
Mixed 596
285% 1,292 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 47.2
166% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 617
473% 649 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$229
642GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 425 428 433 436 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 388
SusWrite 429
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 45.3
152% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 369
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 185 184 187 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 147
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 184
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD WD140EMFZ-11 14TB
8GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 144
Mixed 79.5
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
368% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 117%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 124 124 126 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 122
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
34GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 141 140 142 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 141
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
20GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 170 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 171
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
5GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 95.1
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
482GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 102 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.6
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 101
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 101%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 138 138 138 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 128
Write 129
Mixed 102
SusWrite 135
168% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56%
Great: 61%
ST18000N M000J-2TV103 18TB
12TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 57 62 68 60 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 234
Mixed 222
SusWrite 62.9
247% 188 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 1.1
776% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.1
346% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
WDC WD16 0EDGZ-11B2DA0 16TB
73GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 57 62 68 59 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.4% Good
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 127
SusWrite 62.9
156% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 2.6
428% 5.53 MB/s
DQ Read 3.1
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 2.1
399% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 103%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
49GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 58 62 68 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 95.1
Write 97.7
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 62.9
113% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 27.3" 1280 720 DEL42A7 DELL G2723H
Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 3,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback