Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 00:31
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 149 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 445 47% 376 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4072) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 127 Parallax 124 116% 131 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 100 Splatting 96.7 91% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPL1000G 1TB 645 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 835GB free Firmware: EJFM60.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 181 187 230 200 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,104 Write 1,951 Mixed 1,548 SusWrite 204 272% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 51.3 163% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 820 DQ Write 514 DQ Mixed 708 516% 680 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 359%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 13 11 11 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 160%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 176GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 14 14 15 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 20.9 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ7F4F ZOWIE RL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	300x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	156x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x

SSD
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GBSeagateBench 150%, 932 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 630 samples	85x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16