Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130814
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 00:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 173
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 313
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 860F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.8
37% 42.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 28.1
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 123 16 20 108 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 221
Write 105
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 79.8
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 11.2
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 16.9
13% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105
379GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 362 418 428 428 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 419
Mixed 408
SusWrite 412
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 47
151% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 Kingston 99U5471-058.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ78EE BenQ GW2475H
Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback