Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 133% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 01:23
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$160 15,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 72.2 1-Core 169 2-Core 288 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 610 8-Core 1,098 103% 854 Pts	64-Core 1,460 90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 212 Reflection 195 Parallax 187 173% 198 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 144 Splatting 128 122% 153 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 544 489 448 482 475 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1972 Write 1,631 Mixed 668 SusWrite 534 266% 1,201 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 59.1 218% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,144 DQ Write 989 DQ Mixed 911 725% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 254%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$350 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 2.5TB free Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 465 470 488 487 487 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 468 Mixed 462 SusWrite 473 107% 476 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 62.7 212% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 364 274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 137%
Team T2534TB 4TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: VE0R840N SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 208 321 358 360 357 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 143 Write 212 Mixed 145 SusWrite 301 46% 200 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 25.1 65% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 180 139% 185 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 81 99 88 87 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 74 Write 106 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 94.3 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 369GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 85 84 89 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 53 Write 57.4 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 87 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 736GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 123 123 132 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 90.2 Write 94.9 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 126 60% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 183% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 2,613 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.7% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 26.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 27.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 53: 0P 5R 9G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	27"	1280 720	SAM105C LC27G7xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	44x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	20x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $60Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $514

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 53: 0P 5R 9G 1B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)