Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20130427
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 19:58
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 90 2-Core 173 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 301 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P3000 729 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 869GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0303B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 376 Write 346 Mixed 326 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 17.1 93% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 19.3 28% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 552GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 81.8 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
HGST Touro Mobile 3.0 128GB 113GB free, PID 1020 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 115 Write 46.3 Mixed 24 63% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 5.4 346% 7.67 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04EF Team-Elite-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	56	60	23.5"	1280 720	WET2360 WH24FC9019

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16