Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q910  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3183-A1
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 31.4
1-Core 25.7
2-Core 41.2
21% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 62.2
8-Core 74.3
9% 68.2 Pts
64-Core 83.2
5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 202 206 206 207 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 320
Write 236
Mixed 162
SusWrite 208
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.5
62% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 122
94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5603-012.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 18 12 32 0" 1280 720
Typical ESPRIMO Q910 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback