Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504ZA
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 143
49% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 342
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 286D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 14.5
12% 15.2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.4
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme FORESEE P709F128G 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0527B0P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 48 64 71 51 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 516
Write 282
Mixed 215
SusWrite 58
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 4.6
78% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 49.8
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 94.3
86% 124 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback