Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504ZA
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 03:27
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 48
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 154
49% 90 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 516
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 286D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.8
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 14
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 931 937 952 942 1009 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,010
Write 795
Mixed 813
SusWrite 975
202% 898 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 34.8
113% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 313
228% 300 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 148%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 27.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 49 60 15.5" 1920 1009 AUO21ED
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback