PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell PowerEdge T30 |
Motherboard | Dell PowerEdge T30 (all builds) |
Memory | 57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180510 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '24 at 19:31 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
216%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 368 373 386 401 402 MB/s
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
893GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 371 374 387 401 402 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 26.5TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 34 5.1 5.6 5.9 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G6D1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24% | 12% | 83 | 209 | 59 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | GSM7700 LG 32 FHD |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples | 226x |
Xeon E3-1275 v5IntelBench 78%, 368 samples | 5x |
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples | 144x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $75 |