Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '18 at 02:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.30GHz
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 119
51% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 492
43% 367 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
XFX(1682 3200) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.09 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,435
Write 736
Mixed 1,068
238% 1,080 MB/s
4K Read 3.27
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 2.25
9% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 105%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Kingston KP382H-HYC Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston KP382H-HYC 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 28.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $843
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback