Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99H
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1100 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 04:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 124
55% 90 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 435
39% 330 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 37.1
31% 40.1 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 26.3
27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP320 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 93 98 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 303
Write 98
Mixed 135
SusWrite 89.1
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 19.4
85% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 73.4
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 85.7
62% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
803GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 138 138 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 141
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 134
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2666U1908JG 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 172 4 60 18.9" 1280 720 LEN0990 L1951p Wide
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback