Standard Standard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 15:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 67.1
1-Core 182
2-Core 352
104% 201 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,168
113% 932 Pts
64-Core 1684
104% 1684 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Device(1D05 1395) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 89.3
42% 57.1 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 104
59% 67.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1395) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 192
Parallax 212
165% 202 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 181
Splatting 127
158% 204 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 150%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPK002T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10932
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1732 1369 1540 1875 1938 2020 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,137
Write 1,301
Mixed 1,707
SusWrite 1,746
386% 1,723 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 51.5
175% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1061
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 817
569% 732 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 277%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MRA5S480FFFD16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 46.5
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 46.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 41.6
123% 43.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 129%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0B87
Typical Standard Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback