Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory42.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 12:05
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 951
91% 753 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 158
Parallax 172
132% 164 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 129
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST18000NM002J-2TV133 18TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: PAL7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 97 95 96 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 185
Write 181
Mixed 101
SusWrite 92.9
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 1
49% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
3% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 43%
Nvme Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 156 191 181 203 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,094
Write 1,949
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 286
256% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 55.3
186% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 933
684% 885 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 157%
Great: 297%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
180GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.7 10 10 9.7 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 348
Write 39.7
Mixed 207
SusWrite 9.6
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 1.1
51% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
3% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 5.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 10 11 10 11 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
Read 217
Write 48.5
Mixed 194
SusWrite 11.7
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 0.2
3% 6.33 MB/s
Nvme WD_BLACK SN770 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 2147 2120 2157 2158 2139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 2227
Mixed 1,658
SusWrite 2,088
452% 2,002 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 53.9
184% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1750
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,351
1,043% 1,435 MB/s
Poor: 240%
This bench: 331%
Great: 630%
WD My Book 1130 2TB
377GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 104
138% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 34.1
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 27.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback