Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory117.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 05:22
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 999
92% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,975
122% 1,975 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 61
Parallax 98.9
53% 75.1 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 45.7
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2006 1837 1707 1708 1956 1947 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,349
Write 2,336
Mixed 2,253
SusWrite 1,860
496% 2,200 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 79.4
256% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 610
467% 640 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 317%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$570
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 419 421 429 428 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 403
Write 365
Mixed 349
SusWrite 421
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 35.1
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 193
146% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 129%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
15GB free
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 855
Write 541
Mixed 551
144% 649 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.2
160% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 318
260% 362 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
MD1000GLSA854-PS 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: AX0D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 111
66% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 190 177 181 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 104
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 181
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
402% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 27.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 60 37" 1920 1017 SHP101E SHARP HDMI
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback