Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240711
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateAug 18 '24 at 09:47
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 50.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 299
89% 173 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 837
85% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 24.4
17% 20 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 18
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C2S3T/120G 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 55 45 54 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 57.5
19% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 14.8
80% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 19.2
38% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36%
Great: 100%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 110 113 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 114
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 152 159 159 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 150
Mixed 110
SusWrite 156
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 33% 27 78 49 100 23.8" 1280 720 CTM1500 SMX24X3FA
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback