Asus 1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1000  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1000
Memory1.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '16 at 07:51
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 42.2
1-Core 7
2-Core 11.5
17% 20.2 Pts
4-Core 11.5
8-Core 11.4
2% 11.4 Pts
64-Core 11.4
1% 11.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACJC2M128SMP 128GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.095.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 122
Write 102
Mixed 101
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 1.57
29% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 39.4
DQ Mixed 2.93
10% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.79% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback