Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120703
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJan 31 '18 at 13:31
Run Duration424 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 388
46% 353 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 5.53
6% 7.06 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 8.13
Splatting 8.52
7% 8.81 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 113
Write 98.7
Mixed 78.6
72% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.54
110% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 88%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 146
Write 177
Mixed 108
185% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.21
56% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 67%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
84GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 89.9
Write 83.6
Mixed 52.7
93% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%
Generic Flash HS-COMBO 4GB
2GB free, PID 2228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 12
Write 7.2
Mixed 8.63
11% 9.26 MB/s
4K Read 2.22
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
9% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 5%
Generic- SD/MMC 2GB
1GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Read 7.89
Write 9.43
Mixed 8.16
11% 8.49 MB/s
4K Read 2.78
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
12% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback