Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '16 at 10:39
Run Duration435 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 70.7
43% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 246
23% 193 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2848) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5900
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 35.8
26% 32.5 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 33.2
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,752
Write 1,476
Mixed 1,549
355% 1,592 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 31.2
100% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 18.2
40% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 197%
Great: 262%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
382GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 494
Write 163
Mixed 277
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.4
74% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 41.1
49% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 126%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 112
Write 124
Mixed 116
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.27
93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%
TDK LoR TF30 USB 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 069d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 173
Write 35.7
Mixed 38.8
78% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.13
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.04
47% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 26%
Freecom DataBar USB2.0 4GB
3GB free, PID fcf6
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 7.97
Mixed 11.9
17% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.56
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.006
28% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 8%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 7.22
Mixed 9.8
13% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
16% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 38.1
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 10.4
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback