Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 02:39
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,012
93% 780 Pts
64-Core 1436
89% 1436 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 162
Parallax 140
122% 151 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 144
Splatting 118
104% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,218
Write 1,330
Mixed 1,395
364% 1,648 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 29.7
151% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 43.7
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 28.9
37% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 218%
Great: 283%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 2TB
611GB free
Firmware: 1053
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 86.2
67% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.34
84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 67%
JMicron H/W RAID0 10TB
8TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.1% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 200
Mixed 101
205% 167 MB/s
4K Read 9.21
4K Write 5.31
4K Mixed 0.41
229% 4.98 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 62.8
MC Mixed 54.6
169% 59 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 148%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 2,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback