MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 215 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 732 67% 563 Pts	64-Core 970 60% 970 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Sapphire(174B E271) CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 39.5 27% 34.3 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 35.3 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3536 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1830 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 197 197 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 274 (C2) HDA temperature 73 60 171799805979 (F1) Unknown 100 100 137751	66% Good	Read 510 Write 356 Mixed 350 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 9.65 70% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 36.2 DQ Mixed 9.73 27% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 95%
WL500GSA3254G 500GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 103GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 186 6683 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 173 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 150 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 100 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 72 (C2) HDA temperature 122 104 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	31.9% Below average	Read 55.1 Write 55.8 Mixed 55.6 42% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 61%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 34GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 172 1358 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3299 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2081 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 52 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 192 192 24722 (C2) HDA temperature 120 108 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	40.1% Average	Read 68.5 Write 71.4 Mixed 88.3 58% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.15 38% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 71%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB 2,278 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 13GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 49 (03) Spinup time 143 140 1850 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6903 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2528 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6794 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 196 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6706 (C2) HDA temperature 118 97 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	23% Poor	Read 39 Write 40.9 Mixed 38.9 30% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.14 51% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD 2x8GB 1,299 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 33.5 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 27.6 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	20x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $479

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)